NeutralX Logo

Energy Modeling Software Overview: Choosing the Right Tool

Building energy modeling software is essential for designing efficient structures and achieving LEED certification. Compare popular tools including eQUEST, EnergyPlus, DesignBuilder, IES VE, and Carrier HAP to select the best solution for your project needs and technical requirements.

November 13, 2025
Updated November 13, 2025

Building energy modeling (BEM) has become essential for designing energy-efficient structures, achieving green building certifications, and meeting increasingly stringent building codes. With numerous software options available, selecting the right tool requires understanding capabilities, workflows, and project requirements. This guide compares leading energy modeling platforms to help you make informed decisions.

What is Building Energy Modeling?

Building energy modeling uses physics-based calculations to predict and analyze building energy consumption. Engineers, architects, and energy consultants use BEM to:

  • Design new buildings for optimal efficiency
  • Analyze retrofit opportunities in existing buildings
  • Demonstrate compliance with energy codes (ASHRAE 90.1, IECC)
  • Achieve LEED certification and other green building standards
  • Size HVAC systems accurately
  • Evaluate renewable energy integration
  • Compare design alternatives
  • Predict operating costs

The core of any energy model is a 3D representation of the building including:

  • Geometry and orientation
  • Construction assemblies and materials
  • HVAC systems and controls
  • Occupancy schedules
  • Lighting and plug loads
  • Climate data for the location

Software then simulates building performance hour-by-hour for an entire year, accounting for weather variations, occupancy patterns, and system interactions.

Key Software Comparison

eQUEST (DOE-2 Engine)

Overview: Free energy modeling software developed by James J. Hirsch & Associates, powered by the DOE-2 simulation engine.

Strengths:

  • Zero cost (widely accessible)
  • Wizard-based interface (easier learning curve)
  • LEED-approved for energy modeling
  • Extensive library of HVAC systems
  • Fast simulation times
  • Accepted by most authorities having jurisdiction
  • Detailed hourly output reports

Limitations:

  • Windows-only platform
  • Dated user interface
  • Limited integration with BIM tools
  • Less granular control than EnergyPlus
  • Graphical interface can be limiting for complex geometries

Best For:

  • LEED energy modeling
  • Small to mid-size commercial buildings
  • Projects with standard HVAC systems
  • Consultants needing fast turnaround
  • Budget-conscious firms

Learning Curve: Moderate (1-3 months to proficiency)

EnergyPlus

Overview: Open-source simulation engine developed by the U.S. Department of Energy, serving as the foundation for multiple front-end interfaces.

Strengths:

  • Most detailed and accurate simulation engine
  • Free and open source
  • Cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux)
  • Extremely flexible and customizable
  • Handles complex HVAC systems
  • Advanced daylighting and natural ventilation analysis
  • Research-grade accuracy
  • Extensive documentation and user community

Limitations:

  • Text-based input files (requires front-end GUI)
  • Steep learning curve
  • Time-consuming for simple projects
  • Requires deep technical knowledge
  • Limited graphical interface in standalone version

Best For:

  • Research and academic applications
  • Complex or unusual HVAC systems
  • Passive design strategies
  • Advanced users needing maximum control
  • Custom analysis not possible in other tools

Learning Curve: Steep (3-6 months to proficiency)

Popular Front-Ends:

  • OpenStudio (free, SketchUp plugin)
  • DesignBuilder (commercial, comprehensive GUI)
  • IES VE (commercial, integrated platform)

DesignBuilder

Overview: Comprehensive commercial software with EnergyPlus simulation engine and intuitive 3D interface.

Strengths:

  • User-friendly 3D modeling interface
  • EnergyPlus simulation accuracy
  • CFD analysis for natural ventilation
  • Daylighting analysis (Radiance integration)
  • HVAC design and sizing
  • Cost analysis capabilities
  • Extensive template library
  • Good integration with BIM workflows

Limitations:

  • Expensive licensing ($$$)
  • Windows-only
  • Can be slow for large/complex buildings
  • Some advanced EnergyPlus features not exposed

Best For:

  • Design teams wanting EnergyPlus accuracy with easier interface
  • Projects requiring daylighting and CFD
  • Integrated energy and environmental analysis
  • Firms with budget for commercial software

Learning Curve: Moderate (2-4 months to proficiency)

Cost: $5,000-15,000+ depending on modules

IES VE (Integrated Environmental Solutions Virtual Environment)

Overview: Premium integrated platform for building performance analysis with multiple specialized modules.

Strengths:

  • Comprehensive integrated platform
  • Excellent for LEED and BREEAM certification
  • Advanced daylighting analysis
  • CFD capabilities
  • Energy, lighting, thermal comfort, HVAC, and renewables in one platform
  • Strong technical support
  • Regular updates and development
  • Revit integration

Limitations:

  • Expensive ($$$+)
  • Steep learning curve
  • Requires multiple modules for full functionality
  • Can be overkill for simple projects

Best For:

  • Large commercial and institutional projects
  • Green building certification consultants
  • Firms needing integrated analysis platform
  • Projects with advanced performance requirements

Learning Curve: Steep (3-6 months to proficiency)

Cost: $10,000-30,000+ depending on modules

TRACE 3D Plus

Overview: Trane's commercial software for load calculations and energy analysis.

Strengths:

  • Integrated load calculations and energy modeling
  • Strong HVAC system libraries (Trane bias)
  • LEED-approved
  • Good graphical interface
  • Equipment selection integration
  • Accurate for standard commercial buildings

Limitations:

  • Less flexible than EnergyPlus-based tools
  • Trane equipment bias
  • More expensive than eQUEST
  • Limited advanced features

Best For:

  • Mechanical engineers doing load calculations and energy modeling
  • Projects using Trane equipment
  • Standard commercial HVAC applications

Learning Curve: Moderate (2-3 months to proficiency)

Cost: $2,000-5,000+

Carrier HAP (Hourly Analysis Program)

Overview: Carrier's free software for load calculations and energy analysis.

Strengths:

  • Free to download and use
  • Integrated load calculations and energy modeling
  • Extensive HVAC library (Carrier focus)
  • Familiar to many mechanical engineers
  • Good for system sizing
  • Fast simulations

Limitations:

  • Not LEED-approved for energy modeling
  • Carrier equipment bias
  • Less detailed than DOE-2 or EnergyPlus
  • Limited building geometry handling
  • Windows-only

Best For:

  • HVAC design and equipment selection
  • Preliminary energy analysis
  • Mechanical engineers familiar with Carrier tools
  • Quick feasibility studies

Learning Curve: Moderate (1-2 months to proficiency)

Cost: Free

Selection Criteria

Project Type

Residential:

  • REM/Rate (specialized residential)
  • HOT2000 (Canada)
  • BEopt (residential optimization)

Small Commercial:

  • eQUEST (cost-effective, LEED-approved)
  • Carrier HAP (if not for LEED)

Large Commercial:

  • DesignBuilder (balance of usability and power)
  • IES VE (comprehensive analysis)
  • TRACE 3D Plus (mechanical focus)

Institutional/Complex:

  • IES VE (advanced capabilities)
  • EnergyPlus with OpenStudio (maximum flexibility)

Certification Requirements

LEED Certification: LEED accepts only specific software:

  • eQUEST ✓
  • EnergyPlus ✓
  • IES VE ✓
  • DesignBuilder ✓
  • TRACE 3D Plus ✓
  • Carrier HAP ✗ (not approved)

Passive House:

  • PHPP (specialized Passive House tool)
  • EnergyPlus (with Passive House modeling)
  • DesignBuilder (Passive House module)

Energy Codes (ASHRAE 90.1, IECC): Most mainstream tools acceptable

Budget Considerations

Free Options:

  • eQUEST (full-featured, LEED-approved)
  • EnergyPlus (requires front-end interface)
  • Carrier HAP (not LEED-approved)
  • OpenStudio (EnergyPlus front-end)

Moderate Cost ($2,000-10,000):

  • TRACE 3D Plus
  • DesignBuilder (entry-level license)

Premium ($10,000+):

  • IES VE (comprehensive platform)
  • DesignBuilder (full modules)

User Experience Level

Beginners:

  • eQUEST (wizard interface)
  • Carrier HAP (familiar to engineers)
  • DesignBuilder (intuitive 3D)

Intermediate:

  • TRACE 3D Plus
  • OpenStudio
  • DesignBuilder

Advanced:

  • IES VE
  • EnergyPlus (text-based)
  • Custom scripting and analysis

Integration Requirements

BIM Integration (Revit):

  • IES VE (excellent)
  • DesignBuilder (good)
  • OpenStudio (developing)
  • eQUEST (limited, via gbXML)

CAD Integration:

  • Most tools import DXF/DWG
  • Quality varies significantly
  • Manual cleanup often required

SketchUp:

  • OpenStudio (native plugin)
  • eQUEST (via gbXML export)
  • DesignBuilder (import capability)

Workflow Considerations

Typical Energy Modeling Process

  1. Gather Project Data:

    • Architectural drawings
    • HVAC design information
    • Occupancy and usage schedules
    • Utility rate structures
    • Climate data for location

  2. Create Baseline Model:

    • Build 3D geometry
    • Assign construction assemblies
    • Define HVAC systems
    • Set schedules and loads
    • Calibrate to design assumptions

  3. Run Simulations:

    • Baseline energy consumption
    • Proposed design alternatives
    • Parametric analysis of key variables

  4. Analyze Results:

    • Energy use by end-use
    • Peak loads and demand
    • Comfort metrics
    • Cost analysis
    • Compliance verification

  5. Iterate and Optimize:

    • Test design alternatives
    • Identify cost-effective improvements
    • Balance energy and first cost

  6. Document and Report:

    • Compliance documentation
    • Design recommendations
    • Economic analysis
    • Certification submittals

Time Investment

Simple Building (10,000 sf, standard HVAC):

  • eQUEST: 8-16 hours
  • DesignBuilder: 12-20 hours
  • IES VE: 16-24 hours

Complex Building (100,000 sf, multiple systems):

  • eQUEST: 40-80 hours
  • DesignBuilder: 60-120 hours
  • IES VE: 80-160 hours

Time scales with complexity, model detail, and user experience.

Emerging Trends

Cloud-Based Platforms:

  • Web-based simulation (no installation)
  • Collaborative workflows
  • Automatic updates
  • Examples: Sefaira, cove.tool

AI and Machine Learning:

  • Automated model generation from drawings
  • Intelligent design recommendations
  • Predictive analytics

Real-Time Analysis:

  • Early-stage design integration
  • Instant feedback on design changes
  • Parametric optimization

BIM Integration:

  • Seamless data exchange
  • Automated model updates
  • Reduced data re-entry

Conclusion

Selecting energy modeling software depends on project requirements, budget, user expertise, and certification needs. For most commercial projects requiring LEED certification, eQUEST offers the best value, while DesignBuilder and IES VE provide more comprehensive capabilities at higher cost.

Beginners should start with eQUEST or Carrier HAP to learn fundamentals before advancing to more complex tools. Advanced users seeking maximum flexibility should explore EnergyPlus with OpenStudio or DesignBuilder.

Regardless of tool selection, energy modeling expertise takes time to develop. Invest in training, start with simple projects, and gradually increase complexity as skills improve. The insights gained from energy modeling—identifying cost-effective efficiency measures, optimizing HVAC systems, and achieving green building goals—far outweigh the learning investment.

Back to all articles Explore Resource Hub